Cancer Loves Sugar, Is this a weakness ?
Every dr. learned back in medical school all about Otto Warburg's discovery; a discovery of humongous proportions, because way back in the thirties Otto discovered the main biochemical cause of cancer, or what differentiates a cancer cell from a normal, healthy cell. Such a big a discovery was this, that Otto Warburg was awarded the Nobel Prize.
Cancer has only one prime cause. It is the replacement of normal oxygen respiration of the body's cells by an anaerobic [i.e., oxygen-deficient] cell respiration. -Dr. Otto Warburg But what else does Warburg's discovery tell us? First off, it tells us that cancer metabolizes much differently than normal cells. Normal cells need oxygen. Cancer cells despise oxygen. In fact, oxygen therapy is a favorite among many of the alternative clinics we've researched. Another thing this tells us is that cancer metabolizes through a process of fermentation. If you've ever made wine, you'll know that fermentation requires sugar. The metabolism of cancer is approximately 8X greater than the metabolism of normal cells.
Okay, so here is what we can put together knowing the above: The body is constantly overworked trying to feed this cancer. The cancer is constantly on the verge of starvation and thus constantly asking the body to feed it. When the food supply is cut off, the cancer begins to starve unless it can make the body produce sugar to feed itself.
The wasting syndrome, cachexia, is the body producing sugar from proteins (you heard it right, not from carbohydrates or fats, but from proteins) in a process called glycogenesis. This sugar feeds the cancer. The body finally dies of starvation, trying to feed the cancer. Now, knowing that one's cancer needs sugar, does it make sense to feed it sugar? Does it make sense to have a high carbohydrate diet?
The reason Food Therapies for cancer even exist today (beyond the fact that they work) is because someone once saw the connection between sugar and cancer. There are many food therapies, but not a single one allows many foods high in carbohydrates and not a single one allows sugars,
BECAUSE SUGAR FEEDS CANCER.
Why doesn't your physician tell you this? Hard to tell. Maybe your dr. feels it is his job to cure your cancer, not yours. Maybe because your dr. learned about Warburg, but never put the rest together, never placed nutrition into the equation. Maybe because your physician didn't study nutrition. Maybe due to the fact that he could face a felony, fine, loss of license, & imprisonment in some states if he treated cancer with anything except surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation. Heck, as late as 1978, the AMA's official position (found in the Congressional Record) was that nutrition had nothing to do with disease. However, as an MD, I along with other Drs. who've paid attention to this sugar-craving cancer stuff have come up with some remarkable therapies for cancer. Laetrile is just one. Hydrazine Sulfate, which stops the process of glycogenesis in greater than 50% of all patients with cachexia is another.
Awhile back (2004), at the Univ. of Minnesota, they were experimenting with a chemotherapy delivered in a "smartbomb." Here's the scoop: the drug is wrapped in a coating that stays intact as it travels through the body, that is until it reaches a location of no oxygen. When it reaches this "no oxygen" location, the coating falls apart releasing the chemotherapy to destroy the cancer, because the only place in your body where there is no oxygen is the cancer site. The results of this study have been buried. Nothing exists on it. There are, however, lots of articles on cancer smart bombs, but the Univ. of MN research just cannot be found. Searching for a few key words, we've found only our article (republished at quite a few sites) mentioning this study. Then there are the food therapies aimed at starving cancer. Knowing what cancer loves, the cancer patient avoids them. Cancers like cooked foods over raw (cooking destroys enzymes and heat sensitive vitamins), so check out our article on the cancer diet. Do not forget, cancer loves sugar. If you dislike your cancer, then don't feed it sugar.
A research-driven fellow that I located has chosen to "trick" cancer cells with a "Trojan Horse" concept that he created. A retired financial type, Don Porter, with a long "Due Diligence" background ("Due diligence" is a term used for a number of concepts involving either an investigation of a business or person prior to signing a contract, or an act with a certain standard of care. It can be a legal obligation, but the term will more commonly apply to voluntary in-depth investigations. A common example of due diligence in various industries is the process through which a potential acquirer evaluates a target co. or its assets for acquisition), identified the above Nobel Prize winning concepts & studied Dr. Otto Warburg (and MANY others) extensively and determined that two procedures or Protocols would resolve cancer & most other health issues.
These two Porter methods are:
• An Organic Plant Based Diet with Michio Kushi and Verne Varona Macrobiotic concepts incorporated into this special cancer diet.
• A Protocol (Trojan Horse) Baking Soda with sugar (Maple Syrup or Molasses) that the starved cancer cells require for survival. Their survival instinct causes high alkalinity pH from the baking soda (about a 9 pH)to be devoured by the cancer cells resulting in a rapid demise of the cancer cells.
Very Ingenious ! Mr. Porter suggests that cancer victims eat an Organic PLANT Based Macrobiotic Diet first to strengthen immune function/system. Then with an efficient immune capability, kill the cancer cells with his DJP Protocol and be able to allow the immune function/system to rebuild the dead cancer cells in the victims bodies. Porter did it to himself, a stage IV metastasized cancer victim, after witnessing a stage IV metastasized cancer fellow have success. He read MANY books, pointed his success out to others and has an IMPRESSIVE list of assisting others in also beating serious and some long term cancer issues. Melanoma, 10 year duration cancers, and others. Porter's logic, implementation, basic chemical procedures, methodology, are backed up by impressive research of the methods of Dr. Otto Warburg, Michio Kushi, Verne Varona, Dr. Anthony Satillaro, Dirk Benedict, Dr. Campbell, Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn Dr. Dean Ornish, Dr. Ruan Zhao, Dr Simoncini of Italy, etc.
Porter is providing his findings/protocols along with his specific procedures and diet to anyone at "No Cost", an extraordinary decision in this economy of health care issues and costs. A traditional cancer procedure of chemo, radiation, operations and drugs can cost several hundred thousand dollars (or more) with an under 10% success rate, based upon a 5 year survival. Porter was diagnosed in April 2007 and did NO Chemo or Radiation!
Cancer has only one prime cause. It is the replacement of normal oxygen respiration of the body's cells by an anaerobic [i.e., oxygen-deficient] cell respiration. -Dr. Otto Warburg But what else does Warburg's discovery tell us? First off, it tells us that cancer metabolizes much differently than normal cells. Normal cells need oxygen. Cancer cells despise oxygen. In fact, oxygen therapy is a favorite among many of the alternative clinics we've researched. Another thing this tells us is that cancer metabolizes through a process of fermentation. If you've ever made wine, you'll know that fermentation requires sugar. The metabolism of cancer is approximately 8X greater than the metabolism of normal cells.
Okay, so here is what we can put together knowing the above: The body is constantly overworked trying to feed this cancer. The cancer is constantly on the verge of starvation and thus constantly asking the body to feed it. When the food supply is cut off, the cancer begins to starve unless it can make the body produce sugar to feed itself.
The wasting syndrome, cachexia, is the body producing sugar from proteins (you heard it right, not from carbohydrates or fats, but from proteins) in a process called glycogenesis. This sugar feeds the cancer. The body finally dies of starvation, trying to feed the cancer. Now, knowing that one's cancer needs sugar, does it make sense to feed it sugar? Does it make sense to have a high carbohydrate diet?
The reason Food Therapies for cancer even exist today (beyond the fact that they work) is because someone once saw the connection between sugar and cancer. There are many food therapies, but not a single one allows many foods high in carbohydrates and not a single one allows sugars, BECAUSE SUGAR FEEDS CANCER.
Why doesn't your physician tell you this? Hard to tell. Maybe your dr. feels it is his job to cure your cancer, not yours. Maybe because your dr. learned about Warburg, but never put the rest together, never placed nutrition into the equation. Maybe because your physician didn't study nutrition. Maybe due to the fact that he could face a felony, fine, loss of license, & imprisonment in some states if he treated cancer with anything except surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation. Heck, as late as 1978, the AMA's official position (found in the Congressional Record) was that nutrition had nothing to do with disease. However, as an MD, I along with other Drs. who've paid attention to this sugar-craving cancer stuff have come up with some remarkable therapies for cancer. Laetrile is just one. Hydrazine Sulfate, which stops the process of glycogenesis in greater than 50% of all patients with cachexia is another.
Awhile back (2004), at the Univ. of Minnesota, they were experimenting with a chemotherapy delivered in a "smartbomb." Here's the scoop: the drug is wrapped in a coating that stays intact as it travels through the body, that is until it reaches a location of no oxygen. When it reaches this "no oxygen" location, the coating falls apart releasing the chemotherapy to destroy the cancer, because the only place in your body where there is no oxygen is the cancer site. The results of this study have been buried. Nothing exists on it. There are, however, lots of articles on cancer smart bombs, but the Univ. of MN research just cannot be found. Searching for a few key words, we've found only our article (republished at quite a few sites) mentioning this study. Then there are the food therapies aimed at starving cancer. Knowing what cancer loves, the cancer patient avoids them. Cancers like cooked foods over raw (cooking destroys enzymes and heat sensitive vitamins), so check out our article on the cancer diet. Do not forget, cancer loves sugar. If you dislike your cancer, then don't feed it sugar.
Porter is providing his findings/protocols along with his specific procedures and diet to anyone at "No Cost", an extraordinary decision in this economy of health care issues and costs. A traditional cancer procedure of chemo, radiation, operations and drugs can cost several hundred thousand dollars (or more) with an under 10% success rate, based upon a 5 year survival. Porter was diagnosed in April 2007 and did NO Chemo or Radiation!
No comments:
Post a Comment